Lori Novick-Carson, a teacher at Solomon Schechter Day School in Norwood, Massachusetts, will travel to Israel at the month’s end with Facing History and fourteen other educators to spend ten days at the Tel Aviv Diaspora Museum’s International School for Jewish Peoplehood Studies. The Norwood Transcript and Bulletin interviewed Ms. Novick-Carson about the upcoming journey.
Youth Venture's mission is to help young people participate in addressing social needs. Their website provides guidance about how to start a "Youth Venture" aimed at improving communities at the local and global level.
Youth Venture's mission is to help young people participate in addressing social needs. Their website provides guidance about how to start a "Youth Venture" aimed at improving communities at the local and global level.
Diese Ressource Buch spiegelt die Art und Weise, dass die Migration wirkt sich die persönliche Identität und bietet Dozenten und Studierenden die Ressourcen, um diese Wanderung durch Methoden des Geschichtenerzählens zu prüfen.
Many Facing History educators, as well as scholars and activists, refer to the “tools” that individuals, groups and institutions use to create change - to further civil rights or prevent genocide, for example. These tools might be political, economic, social or psychological in nature, and we often study how people have used them to create positive and negative change. For example, marches and rallies were used by the Nazis to garner support and loyalty. Yet, leaders of the civil rights movements also used marches, such as the March on Washington, to attract attention to their cause.
The scholar Samantha Power, author of A Problem from Hell: America & the Age of Genocide, has suggested that, in dealing with foreign policy and, in particular, genocide, governments imagine a toolbox at their disposal. Each tool in this toolbox would represent a different kind of intervention at the disposal of that government: economic sanctions, condemnation of the genocidaires, military intervention, etc. The problem has been, however, that too often governments and international bodies fail to open these toolboxes. According to Power, the systems, or toolboxes, that may have been designed to prevent genocide far too often "shut down" at precisely the moment when they need to operate. For Power,
You would think that the bigger the crime, you know, the more you would move along this continuum towards the more robust options. But it's almost as though (it's very human in fact, sort of anthropomorphized at the governmental level), it's almost as though the worse the crime, the more likely we are to say, 'Ugh, who can even begin to go there,' and begin to think about making a difference when you have, you know, 8,000 people being murdered a day and bodies, like piling up around the US embassy and other outposts. So if the toolbox--if you think of foreign policy as a toolbox, where you've got all these instruments that you use at difference circumstances, different times, and it's not all or nothing--the toolbox stays shut again and again in the face of genocide.
According to one Facing History teacher, the "image of a toolbox makes real the choices that governments have in dealing with these seemingly overwhelming atrocities and suggests that by carrying a toolbox, we are required to use the tools at our disposal." The toolbox metaphor can be used to represent the resources institutions, governments, communities and/or individuals, including themselves, have to make a difference in society.
There are many ways to incorporate toolboxes in the classroom. Students can “build” toolboxes as a brainstorming activity, providing a stepping-stone to an essay or class discussion. Students can actually construct 3-dimensional toolboxes as well. Toolbox projects can be based on content covered in class and/or additional research. When students are asked to explain, using evidence, how particular tools can help achieve specific goals (e.g. preventing genocide, nurturing citizenship, strengthening democracy, advancing civil rights, etc.), Toolbox Projects provide an effective way to evaluate student learning at the end of a Facing History unit or course.
Procedure:
Step One: Introduce the toolbox metaphor The toolbox metaphor is particularly effective with students because it is easy for most of them to imagine a physical toolbox. You might begin by asking students to brainstorm the purpose of a toolbox and the items that typically are placed inside of one. After students consider how toolboxes are used to build and fix physical structures, ask them to imagine a figurative toolbox that includes tools that can be used to build and fix our communities – local, global and national. You can make this point more specific by linking it to the particular content you are studying.
Step Two: Decide the kind of toolbox that students will be building
Different tools are needed to address different goals. You might align the toolbox with a specific purpose. For examples, students can consider the different tools that may go into each of these toolboxes:
Toolbox for Justice
Toolbox for Democracy
Toolbox for Citizenship
Toolbox for Responding to Difference
Toolbox for Participation
Toolbox for Genocide Prevention
Toolbox for Social Responsibility
Toolbox for Upstanders
Depending on your unit of study, exploring some of these toolboxes may be more appropriate than others. You might focus on only one, such as “Toolbox for Justice,” or you might allow your students to decide the toolbox that is most needed for a given situation or most important to them.
Step Three: Define key term (focus of the toolbox)
A beginning step should include having students clearly define the purpose of their toolbox. In other words, if students are building a “Toolbox for Citizenship” they need to be able to define what citizenship means to them (hopefully building on the definitions of others). This definition step can be done as an individual or whole class activity.
Step four: Identifying tools
Once students have a clear focus for their toolbox, they can begin identifying tools that can help work toward this goal. Depending on how much time you have and the scale of this project, this can be done as a brief brainstorming exercise. Or, students could spend days or weeks researching the tools that have been used during particular periods of history to achieve this goal. For example, if students are creating a “Toolbox for Civil Rights,” they might explore what individuals, groups and institutions did during the Civil Rights Movement.
Step five: Building the toolbox
After students have a list of potential tools, you might ask them to prioritize by having them select a certain number (5-10) that they would put in their toolbox. For each tool they include you might ask them to define the tool, explain its purpose, provide evidence of its usefulness, and describe how it might be used effectively. They might also present cautions or warnings for how the tool could be misused.
Toolboxes can be presented in many formats. They can be as simple as a list of items that students explain to the class. Or, they can be actual 3-dimensional structures with physical items representing each tool. Some teachers may ask students to write an essay to accompany their toolbox.
Step six: Sharing toolboxes
Students can learn a great deal from seeing each other’s toolboxes. You might have students pair up to discuss their choices with a partner. Or, students could showcase their toolboxes to the whole class, as an exhibit or oral presentations. You might use a graphic organizer or prompts to help students compare and contrast the different toolboxes.
Step seven: Debriefing and building new knowledge
What tools are the most popular? Why might that be the case?
What stands out to them about a particular toolbox?
What questions do the toolboxes raise for them? Which tools seem most accessible? To whom? Who might not have access to these tools? Why?
Which tools seem out of their reach at the moment and what could be done to gain access to them?
After viewing other toolboxes, what changes, if any, would they make to their own?
These are examples of questions that can be used to structure a conversation about the toolboxes. Before the discussion, students can reflect in their journals about what they observed. One way to conclude this activity is to have the whole class build a toolbox together, selecting tools from the different student-created toolboxes.
Ce livre de référence reflète la façon dont la migration affecte l'identité personnelle et offre aux éducateurs et aux élèves les ressources nécessaires pour examiner cette migration à travers les méthodes de la narration.
Bordando La Verdad: Arte de Protesta Femenino en el Chile de Pinochet es la historia de las hermanas, esposas y madres que formaban el movimiento de mujeres de protesta en Chile durante la dictadura de Pinochet (1973-1990). Es una increíble historia de coraje y resistencia.
Decidirse a participar se centra en las opciones cívicas—tanto grandes como pequeñas—las personas hacen de sí mismos y otros en su comunidad, nación y mundo. Como maestros y estudiantes a explorar las lecturas de esta colección que llegará a entender que la gente haga opciones pueden no parecer importantes en el momento, pero poco a poco que nos conforman como individuos y ciudadanos globales responsables.
From Facing History and Ourselves: Holocaust and Human Behavior, Chapter 7
In an interview with journalist Gitta Sereny after his arrest in Brazil in 1971 and subsequent trial, Franz Stangl, the commandant of the death camp at Sobibor and later at Treblinka, responded to questions.
“You’ve been telling me about your routines,” I said to him. “But how did you feel? Was there anything you enjoyed, you felt good about?”
A. “It was interesting to me to find out who was cheating,” he
Connections:
How would you answer the questions Wiesenthal raises? Wiesenthal’s tale is followed by the responses of theologians, philosophers, historians, and writers to the two questions. In his response to the questions, Hans Habe wrote:
One of the worst crimes of the Nazi regime was that it made it so hard for us to forgive. It led us into the labyrinth of our souls. We must find our way out of the labyrinth – not for the murderers’ sake but for our own. Neither love alone expressed in forgiveness, nor justice alone, exacting punishment, will lead us out of the maze. A demand for atonement and forgiveness is not self-contradictory; when a man has willfully extinguished the life of another, atonement is the prerequisite for forgiveness. Exercised with love and justice, atonement and forgiveness serve the same end: life without hatred. That is our goal: I see no other.3
Why does Habe believe that “We must find our way out of the labyrinth – not for the murderers’ sake but for our own?” Do you agree?
Primo Levi argued that it was right to refuse to pardon the dying man because it was “the lesser evil: you could only have forgiven him by lying or inflicting upon yourself a terrible moral violence.” Are there lesser and greater evils? What “moral violence” would the man have inflicted upon himself through forgiveness? How do you think Habe would respond?
When asked about forgiveness, Elie Wiesel replied, “No one asked for it.” What is he saying about the perpetrators? About the bystanders?
Notes:
1 Gitta Sereny, Into That Darkness (Pan Books, 1977), 200-202.
Facing History and Ourselves recently hosted "One Person, One Vote: Why Should We Care?" The online workshop is designed to engage students in conversation with one another about civic participation and voting rights. Attendees of the workshop included over 400 educators and students from the United States, South Africa, England, and Northern Ireland.
The Question Formulation Technique helps students articulate, refine and prioritize questions they have about ideas raised in a text, a problem they hope to solve, or any topic they are studying. This strategy was designed by the Right Question Project (www.rightquestion.org). This simple strategy can be easily integrated into the classroom. It can be used as a brainstorming technique at the beginning of a unit or as a synthesis activity at the end of the unit, or any where in between. As students get better at formulating questions, they not only have a tool to help them better understand class material, but a tool that can serve them well as citizens in a democracy.
Procedure:
Step One: Create a prompt The most effective prompts for this activity are statements that are focused clearly enough so that there is a direct link to the purpose of the lesson and are neutral enough so that students feel freely respond to the prompt. Many teachers use prompts that begin with stems such as “Your role/task is to…” or “You want to / A group wants to.” A prompt could also be a description of a class project.
Examples:
-You want to prevent genocide from happening never again.
-Your role is to draft a class contract - a list of rules or expectations that we will follow this year.
-After World War II, the Allies want to achieve justice for the crimes committed by the Nazis.
-You will design a way to teach other students about media literacy.
You can also use visual prompts – a movie or a series of images – as a prompt. After students view the visual prompt, proceed to step two.
Step Two: Students generate questions
In groups, give students a fixed amount of time (5-10 minutes) to generate a list of questions, adhering to these rules:
1)Write down the questions exactly as they are said
2)Do not stop to discuss or answer the questions
3)Write down as many questions as you can
4)Statements should be rephrased as questions.
Step three: Students identify open and closed questions Ask students to look at their lists and put an “O” by all of the open-ended questions (questions with many possible answers) and a “C” by questions that elicit one answer (a “yes/no” question or a question with a factual answer). Then, have students change one of their open questions into a closed question and one closed question into an open question.
Step four: Students prioritize questions
Have groups select 3 questions from their list. It could be the three questions they find most interesting or important or the three questions that they think need to be addressed first.
Step five: Groups share questions
When groups present their questions, ask them to share why they selected these three. The questions that the class generates can be used as the focus of a class discussion, a writing assignment, a research project, or as a tool to help you plan future lessons.
Step six: Reflections
Give students the opportunity to reflect on this process by writing in a journal and/or through a brief discussion. What did they learn about formulating questions? About the content? About their own priorities? About working with others? What challenges did they encounter? How did they manage these challenges? You might also give students the opportunity to select one or two questions, from their own list or from another group’s list, that they would most like to pursue and then write about why they selected this question.